Non-invasive Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants

Related Clinical Trial
The Budesonide in Babies (BiB) Trial Follow-up Results of Newborns With Tracheostomy Safety of Sildenafil in Premature Infants With Severe Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Prolonged Outcomes After Nitric Oxide (PrONOx) A Study of Tobacco Smoke and Children With Respiratory Illnesses Delivery Room CPAP in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants Dexamethasone Therapy in VLBW Infants at Risk of CLD Palivizumab for Prevention of Severe Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Russian Children Estimating Length of Endotracheal Tube Insertion Using Gestational Age or Nasal-Tragus Length in Newborn Infants MRI as a Means to Measure Lung Function: Non-Invasive Imaging in Neonates and Children Seattle-PAP Bubble Nasal CPAP and Work of Breathing High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Combined With Intermittent Sigh Breaths: Effects on Blood Oxygenation and Stability of Oxygenation Comparing Two Different Modes of Ventilation in Pretem Neonates Bilevel VG and PRVC High Frequency Ventilation in Premature Infants (HIFI) Early Caffeine in Preterm Neonates High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Combined With Intermittent Sigh Breaths: Effects on Lung Volume Monitored by Electric Tomography Impedance. Functional and Lymphocytic Markers of Respiratory Morbidity in Hyperoxic Preemies Vitamin A Supplementation for Extremely-Low-Birth-Weight Infants Non-invasive Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants Pilot Trial of Surfactant Booster Prophylaxis For Ventilated Preterm Neonates Randomized Trial of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure or Synchronized Nasal Ventilation in Premature Infants. The Effect of Surfactant Dose on Outcomes in Preterm Infants With RDS Work of Breathing During Non-invasive Ventilation in Premature Neonates Inhaled Nitric Oxide for Preventing Chronic Lung Disease in Premature Infants Intratracheal Budesonide/Surfactant Prevents BPD Bronchopulmonary Disease (BPD) Patient Registry Premature Birth and Its Sequelae in Women Inhaled NO in Prevention of Chronic Lung Disease The Effects of Position on the Oxygenation Instability of Premature Infants as Documented by SpO2 Histograms Trial of Late Surfactant to Prevent BPD: A Pilot Study in Ventilated Preterm Neonates Receiving Inhaled Nitric Oxide Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Via Binasal Prong vs Nasal Mask: a Randomised Controlled Trial Randomized Trial of Hydrocortisone in Very Preterm High-Risk Infants Early NCPAP Before Surfactant Treatment in Very Preterm Infants With RDS Exosurf Neonatal and Survanta for Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome Continuous Versus Intermittent Bolus Feeding in Very Preterm Infants – Effect on Respiratory Morbidity Feasibility and Impact of Volume Targeted Ventilation in the Delivery Room Growth of Airways and Lung Tissues in Premature and Healthy Infants Duration of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Pulmonary Function Testing in Preterm Infants Assessment of Lung Structure and Function of Infants Born Prematurely Post-hospitalization Nursing Effectiveness (PHONE) Study Assessment of the Pulmonary Diffusion Capacity in Healthy Infants and Infants With Chronic Lung Disease NCPAP + Heliox as a Treatment for Infant Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) Neurotrophin Expression in Infants as a Predictor of Respiratory and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes Inhaled Beclomethasone to Prevent Chronic Lung Disease Work of Breathing in Premature Infants at Discharge Efficacy of Recombinant Human Clara Cell 10 Protein (rhCC10) Administered to Premature Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome Hydrocortisone for BPD Clinic Features and Outcome of BPD (SGBPD) Neolifes Heart – Pulmonary Hypertension in Preterm Children Thrombocytopoiesis and Platelet Homeostasis in Infants With Bronchoplumonary Dysplasia Management of Hyponatremia in Preterm Infants on Diuretics Steroids and Surfactant in Extremely Low Gestation Age Infants Dose Escalation Trial Respiratory Outcome at Adolescence of Very Low Birthweight Infants Surfactant Administration During Spontaneous Breathing Determining the Effect of Spironolactone on Electrolyte Supplementation in Preterm Infants With Chronic Lung Disease Developmental Sequelae of Severe Chronic Lung Disorders Long-term Safety and Efficacy Follow-up Study of PNEUMOSTEM® in Patients Who Completed PNEUMOSTEM® Phase-I Study Indoor Air Quality and Respiratory Morbidity in School-Aged Children With BPD Study of Nasal Ventilation In Preterm Infants To Decrease Time on The Respirator Improving Prematurity-Related Respiratory Outcomes at Vanderbilt Study of Inhaled Nitric Oxide (iNO) and Respiratory Outcomes in Late Preterm Infants Follow-up Study of Safety and Efficacy in Subjects Who Completed PNEUMOSTEM® Phase II (MP-CR-012) Clinical Trial Follow-up Safety and Efficacy Evaluation on Subjects Who Completed PNEUMOSTEM® Phase-II Clinical Trial Tidal Neonatal NO, Vitamins A and D, and Infant Lung Disease – The AD-ON Study Nasal Mask and Prong Use in Non-invasive Ventilation for Newborns Azithromycin in the Prevention of Lung Injury in Premature Newborn Randomized Control Trial: Synchronized Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation Versus Non Synchronized Non Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist vs Proportional Assist Ventilation MRI in BPD Subjects A Safety Study of IV Stem Cell-derived Extracellular Vesicles (UNEX-42) in Preterm Neonates at High Risk for BPD Hypercapnia and Its Association With Long-term Respiratory Morbidities in Premature Infants With Chronic Lung Disease Early Versus Late Caffeine for ELBW Newborns Assessment of Lung Aeration at Birth MRI of Lung Structure and Function in Preterm Children BPD Saturation TARgeting Use of Human Milk Cream to Decrease Length of Stay in Extremely Premature Infants Effect of Synchronized vs. Continuous HFNC Using NAVA on WOB in Infants With BPD Antecedents of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Pulmonary Outcomes of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Young Adulthood Aerosolized Albuterol Use in Severe BPD Late Sequelae of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Montelukast in Very Low Birthweight Infants Preterm Infant Inhaled Albuterol Dosing 129Xe MRI in Pediatric Population With BPD Investigation of Polymorphisms in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia In Turkish Population Pulmonary MRI of Ex-preterm Children With and Without BPD To Understand Risk of Emphysematous Changes Comparison of Classification Standards of BPD in Premature Infants Inhaled Corticosteroids for Treatment of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Safety of Sildenafil in Premature Infants Phase II Pilot Study of Early Cortisol Replacement to Prevent Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Intratracheal Umbilical Cord-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Severe Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Dexamethasone Vs Dexamethasone/Methylprednisolone Vs Placebo for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Impact of an Exercise Program for Children Aged 4 to 6 Years With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Trial II of Lung Protection With Azithromycin in the Preterm Infant Forced Oscillometry in Infants With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia The Efficacy and Safety of Montelukast Sodium in the Prevention of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia L-citrulline and Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia The Role of Anti-Reflux Surgery for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Premature Infants With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Enteral Zinc to Improve Growth in Infants at Risk for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Fluid Filled Lung Oxygenation Assistance Trial Trial of Late Surfactant for Prevention of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Predictors of Pulmonary Hypertension Risk in Premature Infants With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Exogenous Surfactant in Very Preterm Neonates in Prevention of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Follow-Up Study of Safety and Efficacy of Pneumostem® in Premature Infants With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Risk Factors in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (Newborn Lung Project) Pilot Study of Topical Steroid for Prevention of Chronic Lung Disease in Extremely Premature Infants. Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: From Neonatal Chronic Lung Disease to Early Onset Adult COPD Gastrin-Releasing Peptide and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Benchmarking Initiative to Reduce Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Physiologic Definition of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Safety and Efficacy of PNEUMOSTEM® in Premature Infants at High Risk for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) – a US Study Inhaled Nitric Oxide for Pulmonary Hypertension and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells For Infants At High Risk For Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia SURFAXIN® Treatment for Prevention of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) in Very Low Birth Weight (VLBW) Infants. Safety of Furosemide in Premature Infants at Risk of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) Mesenchymal Stem Cells for The Treatment of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Infants p16Ink4a in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Children Transpyloric Feeding in Severe Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Follow-Up Study of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Phase 1 Intravenous Citrulline for the Prevention of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Preterm Infants Epidemiological Study for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) in China PREMILOC Trial to Prevent Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Very Preterm Neonates Stem Cells for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Hydrotherapy in Premature Infants With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Inhaled Nitric Oxide (INO) for the Prevention of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) in Preterm Infants Prospective Study on Plasma Pro-endothelin-1 in Predicting Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Interest of Pulmonary Ultrasound to Predict Evolution Towards Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Premature Infants at Gestational Age Less Than or Equal to 34 Weeks of Gestation Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of PNEUMOSTEM® Treatment in Premature Infants With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Inhaled Extra-fine Hydrofluoalkane-beclomethasone (QVAR) in Premature Infants With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Budesonide in Very Preterm Infants at Risk for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Study to Justify Steroid Use in Preterm Neonates to Prevent Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Efficacy of Adding Budesonide to Poractant Alfa to Prevent Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia. Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells For Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells For Moderate and Severe Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Genetic Susceptibility for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Preterm Infants Respiratory Management of Preterm Infants and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

Brief Title

Non-invasive Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants

Official Title

Non-invasive Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants: a Multicentre Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Brief Summary

      Lungs of babies born early are not fully developed and they often need a machine to help them
      breathe. The traditional approach to provide this support is with a breathing tube passed
      into the windpipe. However, we know that breathing tubes can cause injury to the fragile
      lungs of premature babies. Providing breathing support through nose-masks instead of
      breathing tubes (called nasal breathing support) is becoming popular, as it is gentler on
      developing lungs. Doctors, in trying to limit the use of support with a breathing tube, are
      using many different forms of nasal breathing support. The most common form is nasal
      continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) which delivers a constant pressure and the baby
      breathes on his on her own. However, when this strategy is no longer able to support a
      premature baby's breathing, the best way to provide breathing support is not known. Some
      doctors use a strategy called "nasal intermittent positive airway pressure" (NIPPV) which
      gives the baby artificial breaths through the nose-mask. Others simply increase the pressure
      on nasal CPAP to higher than traditional levels. In the first study of its kind, we will
      compare these two strategies of nasal breathing support given to premature babies.
    

Detailed Description

      BACKGROUND:

      Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is the most common morbidity of prematurity, and affects up
      to 40% of all preterm infants. It is independently associated with long term pulmonary and
      neurodevelopmental impairment, and confers a significant cost to society. Although
      development of BPD is multifactorial in nature, endotracheal mechanical ventilation (EMV) is
      known to be a significant contributor and strategies aimed at avoiding endotracheal
      mechanical ventilation may indeed reduce the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

      Use of non-invasive respiratory support (NRS) has increased over the last decades in an
      effort to minimize dependence on endotracheal ventilation and reduce BPD in preterm neonates.
      Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) remains the prototypical form of NRS and is
      most commonly utilized. Another commonly used modality is non-invasive positive pressure
      ventilation (NIPPV) though it is often relegated as a "rescue" NRS mode following failure of
      NCPAP. NIPPV mimics tidal breathing by delivering "breaths" through a nasal interface at
      regular intervals, and results in higher mean airway pressures compared to NCPAP. Despite the
      increase in use of NRS and evidence from clinical studies demonstrating effectiveness in
      reducing BPD,results at a population level have been rather disappointing, with a recent
      report from the United States actually showing an increasing trend in BPD.

      In recent years, in an effort to further minimize dependence on endotracheal ventilation and
      BPD, some new strategies in NRS use are emerging. One of these approaches is the early use of
      NIPPV in place of NCPAP, rather than as a rescue mode after failure of NCPAP. Two recent
      Cochrane reviews have evaluated NIPPV as an alternative to NCPAP., and suggested superiority
      over NCPAP Based on these results, a number of NICUs have started utilizing NIPPV in place of
      NCPAP as the default NRS mode. However, there are a number of methodological limitations of
      studies that were included in these reviews. First, most studies did not allow for rescue use
      of NIPPV in the NCPAP arms, which is not representative of current clinical practice at most
      NICUs. Secondly, the mean airway pressures in NIPPV vs. NCPAP were vastly different, and the
      question remains whether it is truly the mechanism of NIPPV or simply higher mean airway
      pressure that leads to the superior outcomes reported. These limitations warrant
      consideration because most NIPPV use is not synchronized to patients' respiratory efforts,
      the optimal and safe peak pressures remain unknown.

      An alternative approach that has emerged in recent years is the use of high end-expiratory
      pressures (defined as pressures > 8 cm H2O) on NCPAP. As of 2015, use of high NCPAP pressures
      had only been adopted at 5 out of 28 Canadian neonatal intensive care units (NICU), and
      McMaster Children's Hospital NICU is currently one of only few Canadian centres employing
      pressures > 12 cm H2O on NCPAP. The reasons for the lack of widespread use of high
      end-expiratory pressures on NCPAP are unknown, but may relate to the theoretical concerns of
      altered systemic hemodynamics including impaired cardiac venous return, decreased venous
      drainage of the cerebral circulation as well as the potential for air leak syndromes such as
      pneumothoraces. On the other hand, such high end-expiratory pressures are very commonly and
      safely used during endotracheal mechanical ventilation, as well as during NIPPV. As such, the
      selective use of high end-expiratory pressures on NCPAP non-invasively may be quite
      appropriate. However, the use of high end-expiratory pressures on NCPAP is currently based on
      very limited evidence, and whether adopting this strategy leads to a meaningful decline in
      the dependence on endotracheal ventilation and/or bronchopulmonary dysplasia remains unknown.
      In this study, we aim to comparatively evaluate use of NIPPV vs. high end-expiratory
      pressures (> 8 cmH2O) on NCPAP after failure of NCPAP use at traditional pressures (≤ 8
      cmH2O) among preterm infants. This will be the first prospective clinical study to evaluate
      high end-expiratory pressures on NCPAP, and also the first to compare NIPPV and NCPAP at
      equivalent mean airway pressures. If high NCPAP is shown to be as effective and safe as
      NIPPV, it will lead to a significant advancement in the understanding of NRS and the
      respiratory management of extremely preterm neonates.

      OBJECTIVES AND HYPOTHESIS:

      To determine the feasibility of the conduct of a larger and definitive trial comparing two
      NRS strategies (NIPPV vs. high NCPAP pressures) in preterm infants. Therefore to prepare for
      this a pilot trial is proposed. We hypothesize that the conduct of a definitive trial
      comparing these two NRS modes to assess clinical outcomes will be feasible.

      METHODS:

      Parents of all patients with gestational age < 29 weeks who do not meet any of the exclusion
      criteria will be approached for consent by the research assistant at the earliest
      opportunity. Consent will be sought within the first 72 hours. Subjects whose parents provide
      consent AFTER 72 days will still be eligible, as long as there is no administration of high
      NCPAP or NIPPV outside of randomization for greater than 4 continuous hours AFTER day 10 [240
      hours] of post-natal age . A subject for whom consent is obtained from the parents will be
      considered an "enrolled subject". The research assistant will be responsible for indicating
      this by placing a laminated card at the bedside, and informing both the medical and
      respiratory therapy teams.

      Enrolled subjects who meet NRS failure criteria despite NCPAP 8 cmH2O, or are being extubated
      from invasive mechanical ventilation with a mean airway pressure >/= 10 cmH2O will be
      eligible for randomization to either high CPAP > 8 cmH2O (experimental arm) or NIPPV (control
      arm). Once NRS failure criteria (indicated on bedside laminated card) and randomization
      eligibility is confirmed, the subject will be randomized using an electronic web-based secure
      platform (REDCap). An enrolled subject who gets randomized to one of the two arms will be
      considered a "randomized subject". A study initiation form will be completed by the research
      team within 24 hours of randomization, and a new laminated card indicating arm of
      randomization and extubation criteria will replace the enrollment card. This form will
      include demographic data about the subject, the NRS failure criteria that was met which led
      to randomization, and the suspected underlying pathophysiological mechanism for NRS failure.

      Guidelines for initiation and recommended increments of both high CPAP and NIPPV will be
      provided, with a view towards maintaining similar mean airway pressures between the two modes
      (which will also be placed at patient bedside in randomized subjects). Given the existing
      variability of practice in NRS application and lack of evidence-based guidelines, the
      strategies will NOT provide guidance with regards to day-to-day changes in settings or
      modalities, but rather provide only ceiling limits and maximum allowed pressures for each NRS
      mode. However, interfaces must be limited to either nasal masks or short bi-nasal prongs (RAM
      cannulas will not be allowed). However, ceiling limits and maximum allowed pressures for each
      NRS mode will be provided, as delineated below:

        -  High CPAP - Maximum PEEP: 15 cmH2O

        -  NIPPV - Maximum (set) PIP: 25 cmH2O; AND/OR Maximum (set) PEEP: 12 cmH2O; AND/OR Maximum
           (calculated) MAP: 15 cmH2O

      If NRS failure criteria are met despite escalating settings (with a strongly suggested - but
      not mandated - minimum MAP of 12 cmH2O) whether either randomized arm of high NCPAP or NIPPV,
      the clinician will have one of following three options:

        -  Intubation and endotracheal mechanical ventilation

        -  Escalation of settings within the randomized arm beyond the aforementioned ceiling limit
           - will still be considered failure of assigned mode

        -  Use of an alternate mode of NRS (NIV-NAVA or NIHFV) - but no crossover

      Of note, the maximum recommended settings for each NRS mode need not be reached before
      decision to intubate a subject, at the medical team's discretion. Furthermore, the NRS
      strategy corresponding to the randomization arm reflects use of NRS at any and all times
      after randomization until a randomized subject is discharged or transferred. The decision to
      wean down to traditional NCPAP levels from either arm will be at discretion of the medical
      team. Finally, subjects randomized to a particular strategy will NOT be allowed to cross-over
      to the other arm until the first intubation. Patients may be pulled out from the study
      protocol only at the discretion of the attending medical physician following the first
      intubation, and the reason must be discussed in advance with the PI (A.M.). A customized
      protocol violation form will then be completed by the attending physician, facilitated by the
      research assistant.

      Two major forms of protocol violations will be tracked prospectively (by research
      coordinator):

        1. Use of NIPPV or high CPAP in an enrolled patient outside of randomization. Such patients
           will not be included in any further analysis of clinical outcomes, but will count
           towards feasibility outcome.

        2. A patient with protocol violation related to cross-over; such a patient will be treated
           as intention-to-treat for clinical outcomes, but a set of sensitivity analyses excluding
           such patients (i.e. those that underwent protocol violation) will be conducted (see
           section below on Sensitivity Analyses).

      Assessment of cerebral and renal regional perfusion will be performed using near-infrared
      spectroscopy (NIRS) for all subjects (at the primary study site only) at time of
      randomization. At the time an enrolled subject meets NRS failure criteria, the NIRS leads
      will be placed and recording will be initiated. Perfusion will be assessed immediately prior
      to and continuously for up to 7 days post-randomization (or intubation if sooner that 7
      days). This will be conducted by the research assistant during office hours and the
      respiratory therapist at night.

      At the end of the study period, relevant demographic data and outcome variables for all
      randomized subjects will be extracted from the local Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN) database
      (or other equivalent local database) and from patient charts/electronic records by the
      research coordinator using a customized data collection form.

      DATA ANALYSIS, STATISTICS AND SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATIONS

      All randomized patients will be analyzed using intention-to-treat principle. Mean (SD) or
      Median (IQR) will be reported for continuous variables depending on normality of data, and
      percentages will be reported for categorical variables. T-test (or Wilcoxon rank sum test for
      non-normally distributed variables) and Chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test as
      appropriate) will be used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. All
      analyses will be performed using SAS version 9.4.

      Subgroup analyses (for relevant secondary outcomes) will be performed based on the following
      variables:

        1. Indication for randomization [categorized broadly into: (a) Escalation from NCPAP due to
           Apneas; (b) Escalation from NCPAP due to all other causes; and (c) Post-extubation]

        2. Post-randomization respiratory management reflecting the initial alteration from
           assigned NRS mode [categorized broadly into: (a) Wean down to traditional NCPAP; (b)
           Escalation to alternate NRS mode (including escalation within assigned NRS mode beyond
           maximum allowed settings); or (c) Intubation]

      Sensitivity analyses (for secondary outcomes) based on the following variables:

        1. Protocol violations due to crossover to alternate rescue NRS arm under study - analysis
           of all secondary outcomes will be conducted after excluding such patients.

           a. Protocol violations due to crossover will be categorized into (i) within 7 days of
           randomization and (ii) after 7 days of randomization - exclusion of patients for this
           sensitivity analysis will be based on (i) and (ii) or (ii) only depending on which
           outcome is being analysed.

        2. Excluding patients for whom a minimum MAP of 12 cmH2O on rescue NRS was NOT utilized
           prior to NRS failure.

        3. Excluding patients for whom the post-randomization NRS failure criteria were due to need
           for intubation related to non-respiratory pathology (including but not limited to
           clinical deterioration due to sepsis)

      Regression analyses: No regression analyses are planned a-priori for this pilot trial.

      Regional perfusion data using NIRS (from participant data at primary study site only) will be
      compared within each randomization arm (immediately prior to and 2 hours post-randomization)
      as well as between the two randomization arms 2 hours-post randomization using paired t-test
      and unpaired t-tests, respectively.

      A convenience sample of 100 subjects (40 at the lead institution and 20 per site at the other
      3 centres) will be chosen for the purposes of this pilot trial. Analysis of secondary
      outcomes from this pilot study will help inform the design and sample size for a definitive
      trial comparing high CPAP and NIPPV. The feasibility outcome goals were used to determine the
      sample size, based on methods described by Thabane et al.

      DATA SAFETY AND MONITORING BOARD (DSMB): A DSMB will perform two reviews - one following the
      transition of the first phase of the study (30 randomized patients) and prior to commencement
      of the second phase, with a second review occurring after 40 patients have been randomized
      (70 total) in the second phase.

      Appendix: NRS • FiO2 >50% or rise in FiO2 >20% in ≤12 hours

        -  High CO2 with pH <7.20 (respiratory acidosis) on arterial or capillary blood gas

        -  Increased work of breathing (with RR >80 bpm)

           o Modified DOWNES' score to be completed in real time to objectively describe components
           of increased work of breathing

        -  Apnea/Desaturation/Bradycardia spells (>1 requiring bagging or >4/hour requiring
           moderate stimulation x 4 hours)

        -  Need for intubation related to non-respiratory pathology including but not limited to
           necrotizing enterocolitis, septic deterioration and hemodynamically significant ductus
           arteriosus where none of the above failure criteria are applicable [this option only
           applicable to post-randomization NRS failure] Failure Criteria
    


Study Type

Interventional


Primary Outcome

Ability to enroll a minimum of 10% of all eligible neonates per year at each site

Secondary Outcome

 Failure of assigned NRS mode within 7 days post-randomization

Condition

Preterm Infant

Intervention

Non-invasive respiratory support mode

Study Arms / Comparison Groups

 High NCPAP
Description:  Administration of high NCPAP (> 8 cmH2O) following either failure of traditional NCPAP pressures (≤ 8 cmH2O) OR post-extubation from high endotracheal mechanical ventilation settings (defined as mean airway pressure ≥10 cmH2O)

Publications

* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.

Recruitment Information


Recruitment Status

Other

Estimated Enrollment

100

Start Date

May 15, 2018

Completion Date

March 31, 2022

Primary Completion Date

December 31, 2021

Eligibility Criteria

        Inclusion Criteria: All preterm neonates with gestational age < 29 weeks with a
        chronological age of at least 72 hours admitted to one of four participating NICUs
        (McMaster Children's Hospital, Stollery Children's Hospital, BC Women and Children's
        Hospital, and Women and Infants' Hospital of Rhode Island); whose families have consented
        to study participation; and who do not meet any of the following exclusion criteria:

          1. Major upper airway malformation (cleft lip/palate, severe micro-retrognathia,
             congenital tracheal stenosis or vascular ring, and neck mass/cystic hygroma)

          2. Major (non-airway) congenital abnormality not-yet repaired (congenital diaphragmatic
             hernia, abdominal wall defect, and tracheo-esophgeal fistulas)

          3. Suspected or confirmed chromosomal/genetic abnormality

          4. Administration of high NCPAP or NIPPV outside of randomization for greater than 4
             continuous hours AFTER day 10 [240 hours] of post-natal age.
      

Gender

All

Ages

N/A - N/A

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Contacts

, 905-521-2100, [email protected]

Location Countries

Canada

Location Countries

Canada

Administrative Informations


NCT ID

NCT03512158

Organization ID

2018-2113


Responsible Party

Principal Investigator

Study Sponsor

McMaster Children's Hospital

Collaborators

 Hamilton Academic Health Sciences Organization

Study Sponsor

, , 


Verification Date

April 2020