Esteem Totally Implantable Hearing System

Brief Title

Esteem Totally Implantable Hearing System

Official Title

Esteem Totally Implantable Hearing System Clinical Trial U.S. Pivotal Trial

Brief Summary

      To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Esteem Totally Implantable Hearing System in
      subjects suffering from mild to severe hearing loss.
    

Detailed Description

      Title: Esteem® Totally Implantable Hearing System Clinical Trial

      Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Esteem® Totally Implantable Hearing
      System (hereafter called the Esteem® System) in subjects suffering from mild to severe
      hearing loss.

      Trial Design: This pivotal trial is designed as a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized,
      clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Esteem® System. For this trial the
      subject will act as his or her own control.

      This trial has been designed to meet the United States' regulatory requirements.

      Enrollment Size: It is currently estimated that 50-60 subjects will be enrolled in this
      trial.

      Subject Population: Adult subjects who have mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss, have a
      healthy middle ear, have a speech discrimination score of equal to or better than 40%, and
      have previously worn a hearing aid for a minimum of 3 months with an average daily use rate
      of at least 4 hours are eligible for inclusion in the trial. See detailed inclusion/exclusion
      criteria for specifics.

      Primary Objectives:

        1. To demonstrate that the Esteem® System improves the speech threshold of sensitivity for
           hearing and identifying speech signals as well as or better than the pre-implant hearing
           aid (aided condition).

           Endpoint: Comparison of the speech reception threshold (SRT) using the Esteem® System (4
           months post activation) as compared to the pre-implant aided condition.

        2. To demonstrate that the Esteem® System at the 4 months post- activation visit is as
           effective as or better than the hearing aid for improving speech discrimination
           (intelligibility) as shown by the word recognition score at 50 dB.

           Endpoint: Comparison of the word recognition score using the Esteem® at 4 months
           post-activation compared to the pre-implant aided condition.

        3. To determine the incidence of Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADE) and the incidence
           rate of device failures and replacements.

           Endpoint: The analysis of the incidence of SADEs and device failures and replacements at
           each follow-up.

        4. To demonstrate that the subjects' cochlear function remains unchanged with the Esteem®
           System as shown by comparison of the subjects' pre-implant baseline bone conduction
           threshold versus the subjects' 4 month post-activation visit bone conduction threshold.

      Endpoint: Comparison of bone conduction threshold (BC) using forehead placement at 4 months
      post activation compared to the pre-implant BC threshold.

      Secondary Objectives:

        1. To demonstrate that the Esteem® System at the 4 months post activation visit improves
           the 3-frequency (500, 1000, and 2000 Hz) pure tone average (PTA) when compared to the
           baseline unaided condition.

        2. To demonstrate that the Esteem® System at the 4 months post-activation visit is as
           effective as or better than the hearing aid for improving speech discrimination
           (intelligibility) as shown by the QuickSIN (speech in noise) test results.

        3. To show that the Esteem® System improves Quality-of-Life when compared to the baseline
           aided condition as shown by APHAB results.

        4. To gather subject feedback and comments on the use of the Esteem® System relative to the
           pre-implant hearing aid (aided condition) as shown by the Esteem® Questionnaire.
    

Study Type

Interventional

Primary Outcome

SRT Change

Secondary Outcome

 Comparisons of Change in Global Score on Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) at 4 Months and at 10 Months Post-activation, Relative to Pre-implant Baseline Score

Condition

Mild to Severe Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Intervention

Esteem Totally Implantable Hearing System

Study Arms / Comparison Groups

 Esteem Implant

Description:  Subjects are implanted with the Esteem Totally Implantable Hearing System

Publications

* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.

Recruitment Status

Device

Estimated Enrollment

57

Start Date

January 2008

Completion Date

August 2010

Primary Completion Date

July 2009

Eligibility Criteria

        Inclusion Criteria:

          -  Subject is 18 years old

          -  Subject understands the nature of the procedure and has signed the Subject Informed
             Consent Form prior to the procedure

          -  Subject is willing and able to comply with specified follow-up evaluations and
             understands the audiological test procedures and use of the Esteem System.

          -  Subject has mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss between 500 and 4000 Hz in the
             ear to be implanted with pure tone air-conduction threshold levels within the limits
             of a Hearing Aid (HA) as follow:

        Freq (Hz) 500 1000 2000 3000 4000 LL* (dB HL) 30 35 35 35 35 UL* (dB HL) 100 100 100 100
        100

        *LL = Lower Level; UL = Upper Level

          -  Subject's air-bone gap is no greater than 10 dB at 4 of the 5 following frequencies:
             500, 1000, 2000, 3000 and 4000 Hz.

          -  Subject has an unaided maximum word recognition score of greater than or equal to 60%
             with recorded delivery using a phonetically balanced word list at SRT + 40 dB or at
             maximum tolerable presentation level.

          -  Subject is a current user of a properly functioning and appropriately fit hearing aid.
             This is defined as the subject has used this aid for at least four (4) hours (average)
             per day (in the ear to be implanted) for at least three (3) months for a new aid or
             one (1) month for an adjusted aid.

          -  Subject's hearing aid, in the ear to be implanted, shall appropriately fit optimally.

          -  Subject has normally functioning eustachian tube

          -  Subject has normal tympanic membrane

          -  Subject has a normal middle ear anatomy

          -  Subject has adequate space for Esteem System implant determined via fine cut temporal
             bone CT scan

          -  Subject is a native speaker of the English language.

          -  Subject is a hearing aid user in the ear to be implanted.

        Exclusion Criteria:

          -  Subject has a history of post-adolescent chronic middle ear infections, inner ear
             disorders or recurring vertigo requiring treatment, disorders such as mastoiditis,
             Hydrops or Meniere's syndrome or disease

          -  Subject has a history of otitis externa or eczema for the outer ear canal and the
             investigator believes this will affect the Esteem System implantation

          -  Subject has cholesteatoma or destructive middle ear disease

          -  Subject has life expectancy of two (2) years due to other medical conditions

          -  Subject has retrocochlear or central auditory disorders

          -  Subject is known to be suffering from any psychological, developmental, physical, or
             emotional disorder that the investigator feels would interfere with the surgery or
             follow-up testing

          -  Subject has a known history of fluctuating air conduction and/or bone conduction
             hearing loss over a one-year period of 15 dB in either direction at 2 or more
             frequencies (from 500 - 4000 Hz)

          -  Subject has sudden hearing loss due to unknown cause

          -  Subject has a history of disabling tinnitus, defined as tinnitus which required
             treatment.

          -  Subject is unable to adequately perform audiological testing

          -  Subject has a medical condition or undergoing a treatment that may affect healing and
             the investigator does not believe the subject is a good candidate for the trial.

          -  Subject has diabetes that is not well controlled with medication or diet and the
             investigator does not believe in his best medical judgment that the subject would be a
             good candidate for the trial

          -  Subject is pregnant at the time of device implant

          -  Subject has a history of keloid formation

          -  Subject has known hypersensitivity to silicone rubber, polyurethane, stainless steel,
             titanium and/or gold
      

Gender

All

Ages

18 Years - N/A

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Contacts

Jack A. Shohet, M.D., , 

Location Countries

United States

Location Countries

United States

NCT ID

NCT01092910

Organization ID

0204

Responsible Party

Sponsor

Study Sponsor

Envoy Medical Corporation

Study Sponsor

Jack A. Shohet, M.D., Principal Investigator, 

Verification Date

January 2016