Ciprofloxacin Multiple Dose for Adult Cholera

Learn more about:
Related Clinical Trial
Preventative Intervention for Cholera for 7 Days Impact Study of Cholera Vaccination in Endemic Areas – Clinical Surveillance Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Mobile Health Messages as an Innovative Tool to Facilitate Behavior Change Non-Inferiority, Safety and Lot-to-Lot Consistency of Oral Cholera Vaccine-Simplified Compared to Shanchol™ in Nepalese Safety and Immunogenicity of Peru-15 Vaccine When Given With Measles Vaccine in Healthy Indian and Bangladeshi Infants Safety and Immunogenicity of Single Dose Choleragarde® in HIV-Seropositive Adults PXVX0200 (CVD103-HgR) vs Shanchol in Mali Cholera-Hospital-Based-Intervention-for-7-days A Study of Live Oral Cholera Vaccine, PXVX200 in Healthy Older Adults A Phase 3 Lot to Lot Consistency Study of Live Oral Cholera Vaccine, PXVX200 in Healthy Adults Follow-up of Pregnant Women After a Mass Vaccination of Oral Cholera Vaccine (ShancholTM) in Nsanje Malawi Single Dose Azithromycin in the Treatment of Adult Cholera Safety and Immunogenicity of a New Formulation of Euvichol® Cholera Anti-Secretory Treatment Trial PK Study of iOWH032 in Adult Male/Female Healthy Volunteers & Adult Males With Cholera Single Dose Ciprofloxacin in the Treatment of Childhood Cholera:Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Efficacy of Benefiber-Added, Reduced-Osmolarity WHO-ORS in the Treatment of Cholera in Adults Safety and Immunogenicity of Locally Manufactured New (HL-OCV) Oral Cholera Vaccine Zinc Supplementation in Cholera Patients Immunologic Responses to a Live Attenuated Oral Cholera Vaccine Pilot Introduction of Oral Cholera Vaccine in Orissa, India Safety and Immunogenicity of the Live Oral Cholera Vaccine Candidate PXVX0200 Immunity to Human Cholera in Bangladesh Ciprofloxacin Multiple Dose for Adult Cholera Effect of Probiotic on Immunogenicity of Oral Cholera Vaccine Effectiveness of a Bivalent Killed Whole Cell Based Oral Cholera Vaccine Safety and Efficacy Challenge Study of Live Oral Cholera Vaccine Candidate,PXVX0200, to Prevent Cholera Impact Evaluation of Urban Water Supply Improvements on Cholera and Other Diarrhoeal Diseases in Uvira, Democratic Republic of Congo Protective Immunity to Human Cholera in Bangladesh Safety and Immunogenicity of a New Formulation of a Bivalent Killed, Whole-Cell Oral Cholera Vaccine Oral Cholera Vaccine Delivery in Rural Bangladesh Study of Alternative Vaccination Schedule of Oral Cholera Vaccine Mass Oral Cholera Vaccination in Zanzibar Cholera Vaccine Investment Strategy in Bangladesh Immunogenicity of One Versus Two Doses of Killed Oral Cholera Vaccine Bridging Study for Killed Oral Cholera Vaccine in Ethiopia Safety and Immunogenicity of Locally Manufactured Oral Cholera Vaccine Effect of Extended Dose Intervals on the Immune Response to Oral Cholera Vaccine A Study of Two Doses of Oral Cholera Vaccine (Shanchol™) in Subjects Aged 1 Year and Older in Dominican Republic Introduction of Cholera Vaccine in Bangladesh Evaluation of a Pilot Program to Introduce Cholera Vaccine in Haiti as Part of Global Cholera Control Efforts Single Dose Oral Cholera Vaccine Study in Dhaka, Bangladesh Evaluation of a Boosting Regimen With Oral Cholera Vaccine Single Dose Azithromycin to Prevent Cholera in Children Safety and Immunogenicity of Oral Cholera Vaccine in Kolkata A Study of Two Doses of Oral Cholera Vaccine (Shanchol™) in Subjects Aged 1 Year and Older in the Philippines Randomized Controlled Trial of Killed Oral Cholera Vaccine in Kolkata

Brief Title

Ciprofloxacin Multiple Dose for Adult Cholera

Official Title

Randomized, Double Blind, Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Multiple-dose Ciprofloxacin With Single Dose Azithromycin Therapy for Adults With Cholera Due to Multiply Resistant Strains of V. Cholerae O1 or O139

Brief Summary

      Cholera is an important diarrhoeal disease and an important cause of death, particularly
      during epidemic outbreaks, in Bangladesh and many other developing countries. Used as an
      adjunct to management of dehydration, antimicrobial therapy using an appropriate agent
      reduces diarrhoea duration and stool volume in severe cholera by about half.

      The usefulness of antimicrobials has, however, been greatly eroded by the increasing
      prevalence of resistant strains of V. cholerae O1. From October 2004 at the Matlab Hospital
      and from December 2004 at the Dhaka Hospital of ICDDR, B, V. cholerae strains became
      increasingly resistant to tetracycline and erythromycin- two drugs used in the treatment of
      severe cholera in adults and children respectively. Because of this high prevalence of
      resistance we resorted in early 2005 to using ciprofloxacin for treatment against multi drug
      resistant V. cholerae. Although all isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin when standard
      thresholds for disc-diffusion or E-test were used, but majority of the strains demonstrated a
      MIC value of 0.250 µg/ml, over hundred-folds greater than the V. cholerae strains tested in
      earlier years, which generally had a MIC of <0.003 µg/ml.

      In this randomized, double blind, controlled trial we will assess clinical and
      bacteriological response to 12 hourly oral dose of ciprofloxacin for 3 days in which the
      first two doses will be 1 g each and the later 4 doses will be 500 mg each, and compare them
      with a single 1 g oral dose of azithromycin. We are using azithromycin as the comparator drug
      because current circulating V. cholerae isolates are susceptible (MIC ≤ 0.125 µg/ml) to this
      azithromycin, and single-dose azithromycin has been evaluated earlier to be effective in the
      treatment of cholera.
    

Detailed Description

      Cholera is caused by infection of the human intestine with Vibrio cholerae O1 or V. cholerae
      O139. It is a major health problem in many developing countries including Bangladesh.1 The
      importance of cholera as a worldwide public health problem is evident from the large number
      of countries affected by cholera epidemics.2 Data of the Diarrhoeal Disease Surveillance
      system of the Dhaka Hospital demonstrated that V. cholera O1 was the most frequently isolated
      pathogens (617/2,068 i.e. 30%) in patients attending the hospital with diarrhoeal illnesses
      in 2006. By extrapolating the number of patients enrolled in the surveillance system we
      estimate that over 30,000 out of the total 106,531 patients attending the hospital in 2006
      had cholera- a huge number of patients indeed.

      Like other diarrhoeal illnesses, prevention and management of dehydration using appropriate
      oral and/or intravenous fluids is the mainstay in the management of cholera, irrespective of
      severity. However, appropriate antimicrobial therapy is a very useful adjunct therapy that
      reduces the duration of diarrhoea, the volume of diarrhoeal stools (thus the amount of oral
      and intravenous fluids), and also the duration of faecal excretion of the pathogen, V.
      cholerae O1 and O139 by about 50%. 3-6 Based on these observations made in numerous clinical
      trials, routine use of an appropriate antimicrobial therapy is recommended in the management
      of severe cholera, both in adults and children. All three benefits, as described above, are
      very important in resources-constraint settings where cholera is endemic and also during
      epidemic outbreaks.

      Nosocomial transmission of cholera has also been increasingly recognized as an important
      problem,7 and reducing the duration of excretion of Vibrio cholerae in the stool associated
      with appropriate antimicrobial therapy will presumably decrease the rate of nosocomial
      infection. Lastly, by shortening the course of illness, patients and their families' can more
      quickly return to their normal life, lessening their financial burden, which is of particular
      relevance to socio-economically disadvantaged population who disproportionately share the
      most of the disease burden from cholera.

      From the time of the initial controlled trials of antimicrobial therapy for cholera, almost
      four decades ago,3 a number of antimicrobial agents have been evaluated to be useful in the
      treatment of cholera. Tetracycline, chloramphenicol, doxycycline, furazolidone and
      trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole have all been found to be effective in the treatment of cholera
      when given in multiple doses for 3 days.8-14 Tetracycline and it's long-acting congener
      doxycycline are also effective when administered in a single 1 or 2 g and 200 or 300 mg oral
      doses respectively in adults.13, 14 Vomiting is a common problem in association with
      doxycycline therapy and the problem is greater when doxycycline is used in 300 mg dose (39%)
      compared to when 200 mg dose is used (30%); however, the therapeutic efficacy is better with
      the higher dose (mean duration of diarrhoea were 32h vs. 40h respectively.14

      Antimicrobial resistance has now become an important problem in the clinical management of
      cholera. For example, in 2006 virtually all of the 683 clinical strains of V. cholerae O1
      isolated from patients attending the Dhaka Hospital were multiply drug resistant with 100%
      resistance to ampicillin, furazolidone and co-trimoxazole, 83% to erythromycin and 85% to
      tetracycline.15 All V. cholerae strains remained susceptible to ciprofloxacin by
      disc-diffusion testing, but in E-test their MIC were noted to have increased from 0.002 µg/ml
      during 1993-2003 to 0.250-0.380 µg/ml in 2006

      Resistance of V. cholerae to commonly used drugs such as tetracycline, doxycycline,
      furazolidone and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole have also been reported from Asia, Africa and
      Latin America,17-20 In the early 1990's increasing prevalence of V. cholerae resistant to
      antimicrobials commonly used in the treatment of cholera (tetracycline, ampicillin,
      co-trimoxazole) prompted our group and others to conduct series of trials to identify newer
      affective agents for treatment of cholera. We evaluated ciprofloxacin in both adult and
      children infected with V. cholerae O1 and O139, and observed very good rates of both clinical
      and bacteriological response when used in multiple doses or in a single dose administered
      only once.11, 21, 22

      Ciprofloxacin, is a member of the class of drugs called fluoroquinolones, which act by
      blocking the action of bacterial DNA gyrase.23 This enzyme, which is not present in human
      cells, is responsible for supercoiling of bacterial DNA, an essential element for DNA
      functions.24 Without the three-dimensional DNA structure the cell is unable to replicate, and
      thus bacterial growth is rapidly halted. Ciprofloxacin is the most active of the fluorinated
      4-quinolones (ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin) against bacterial diarrhoea pathogens
      in-vitro as assessed by MIC. It has a relatively long serum half-life.25 Due to its multiple
      mechanisms of excretion toxic levels of quinolones do not usually accumulate in the body.
      Experience suggests that resistance against ciprofloxacin develops much more slowly than
      against the older quinolone agent such as nalidixic acid, as the rate of spontaneous mutation
      is much lower and multiple mutations are required to confer frank resistance.26, 27 Increases
      in the MIC, however, can occur with single mutation, and this is the likely sequence that has
      occurred among currently circulating V. cholerae isolates in Bangladesh.

      Because of resistance to other agents and susceptibility of the isolates to ciprofloxacin
      in-vitro, disc diffusion tests, Dhaka and Matlab Hospitals of ICDDR, B changed their
      treatment policy (early 2005) to single-dose ciprofloxacin therapy for treatment of cholera
      irrespective of patients' age, except for cholera in pregnant women. However, experienced
      physicians at the Dhaka Hospital quickly noted sub-optimal clinical response to ciprofloxacin
      therapy- higher stool output and longer hospitalisation. A quick review of the clinical study
      that we recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine confirmed these findings.28
      In that study only 26 (27%) of 98 patients who were infected with V. cholerae O1 experienced
      an optimal clinical response to single-dose ciprofloxacin, while only 10 (10%) of the 98
      patients had a bacteriologic cure, as defined in the protocol. Eventual determination of MICs
      of the V. cholerae strains from that study revealed that the inferior clinical and
      bacteriological response to ciprofloxacin was associated with an increase in MIC values.29
      Table 1 below shows the increase in ciprofloxacin MIC values that were observed during
      1993-1994 when we first conducted clinical trials with ciprofloxacin to subsequent years
      including in 2005 when ciprofloxacin was first introduced for routine use in the treatment of
      cholera at the Dhaka Hospital. We can see, the median MICs has increased approximately one
      hundred folds between 1993 and 2006.
    

Study Phase

Phase 3

Study Type

Interventional


Primary Outcome

To determine whether clinical success of therapy in the two treatment regimens are comparable.

Secondary Outcome

 Compare the rates of bacteriological success. Compare the diarrhea duration. Compare stool volume of patients. Measure stool concentrations of the two drugs and compare them with MICs of V. cholerae. Record and compare adverse events.

Condition

Cholera

Intervention

Ciprofloxacin

Study Arms / Comparison Groups

 1
Description:  Ciprofloxacin

Publications

* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.

Recruitment Information


Recruitment Status

Drug

Estimated Enrollment

218

Start Date

July 2007

Completion Date

June 2010

Primary Completion Date

October 2008

Eligibility Criteria

        Inclusion Criteria:

          -  Age: 18 - 60 years.

          -  Gender: Male

          -  Duration of diarrhoea: Not exceeding 24 hours

          -  Written informed consent for participation.

          -  Dehydration status: Severe dehydration.

          -  Positive stool dark-field microscopic examination for V. cholerae & culture positive
             for V cholerae

          -  For patients assigned to receive ciprofloxacin, an MIC of the V. cholerae isolates to
             ciprofloxacin of > 0.190 µg/ml and to azithromycin of ≤ 0.125 µg/ml.

        Exclusion Criteria:

          -  History of receiving an antimicrobial agent known to be effective in cholera in
             adults.

          -  Concomitant infection requiring antimicrobial therapy other than the study drugs.

          -  Chronic illness.
      

Gender

Male

Ages

18 Years - 60 Years

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Contacts

Wasif A Khan, MBBS, MS, , 

Location Countries

Bangladesh

Location Countries

Bangladesh

Administrative Informations


NCT ID

NCT00741052

Organization ID

2007-022



Study Sponsor

International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh


Study Sponsor

Wasif A Khan, MBBS, MS, Principal Investigator, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh


Verification Date

August 2008